| What Can the Judiciary Do? | ||
| There is an obvious disparity between
the tested levels of illiteracy and functional illiteracy in the inmate
population, and the lower levels recognized as present during the court
process. Assuming that being illiterate has a status and stigma that even the
most vocal school dropout does not wish to be identified with, we must infer
that we cannot expect much success in encouraging illiterate people to self
identify. There are, however, a number of strategies which we can consider to
ensure full access to the resources of the administration of justice, and to
ensure we are adjudicating on the actual position of the parties. This
non-exhaustive list was developed with the help of a John Howard Society
working group on literacy in Oshawa, Ontario. 1. Be aware of the statistical magnitude of the population in the system of those who are illiterate or functionally so. 2. Be alive to the myriad ways that varying degrees of illiteracy would play havoc in your courthouse with the ability of accused persons, parties and witnesses to access the resources in the system, and to communicate to you the things that they want to tell you and that you need to know to adjudicate properly. 3. Watch for markers that could signal illiteracy. For example:
|
||
| Previous | Table of Contents | Next |